Monday, 8 March 2010

Singapore's Temasek Temasek Review Wesbite

Examination of Temasek is an Internet newspaper which aims to provide independent coverage, balanced and objective socio-political affairs in Singapore. We are not affiliated with any political party or business entity. It is a great resource for Singaporeans who are disillusioned by over-come in Singapore, and want to get to the bottom of the "real situation".Yes, the truth is that no warning was necessary, but perhaps a little more understanding of the Internet as TR.Because at least one reader pointed out TR in the ensuing debate on the website, the IP address alone does not prove anything. Indeed, IP spoofing is a common tactic used in a DOS attack, and the information easily accessible. TR should have known that HPS is an easy prey for anyone.Technical staff from our supplier INEP, who won the 7-day data, and found no activity from SPH DOS concluded: "My understanding of the situation is Temasek Review published the article with very little research on what happened in their server."It is an expert opinion, but if the opinions do not count, here are the facts: Contrary to what the TRS, none of SPH try to "grab" TR material in a way that the load on your server or members SPH staff to initiate a attack on the server.While IP spoofing may have occurred, with a person dressed as a PC in SPH, Why bother? More importantly, when there are bigger fish to fry, why would you need a T connection, unless you were competing for the same public space in the pages of Google News. Only ST probably did not have this intention.This is very serious. Each TR is faced with a denial of service (DoS), Google Notes, and pushes its articles from its Web News Roundup, because your pages are not available. Fortunately, their online infrastructure is improving and DOS (DDOS not because it looks just a machine doing the ping) attacks can be minimized by a dedicated router.A chance of that? To contact Steve Gibson at GRC.com. He has tried before aspiring cracker. Also a good couple of guys in the field of IT department here in Singapore who can help."Because at least one reader pointed out TR in the ensuing debate on the website, the IP address itself does not prove anything. In fact, IP spoofing a common tactic used in a DOS attack and readily available information, TR should have known that HPS is an easy prey for anyone. "You, as a person working in SPH can not be serious to use an anonymous commentator in order to enhance your argument? I say SPH publishers and publishing "wisdow word" often commentators who have no credibility and you do not remember? But why are you using to draw the reader TR detail?Moreover, we as readers here are not interested in observing the special reader, and we do not care if the reader accepts the TR as the cause. Please do not use a scapegoat, as Attorney-finger to use a particular writer to increase "Singapore is not a country but a city" unless they are prepared to believe that the word is also a scapegoat. So you, as representative of SPH, I think the observation RT Reader is right or wrong?So if it's good or bad outcome is willing to do their job and put the reputation of HPS in the range of truth, as TR did? Are you willing to issue an apology from yourself and on behalf of SPH which T is required to do?In other words, when no Cheap Trick proven otherwise to blame the readers of T, derived from land or from suppliers / SPH_Employee responsible for your query. No more can not prevent Sing Wong.Our hosting company is RTG Asia, outs whore VPS and dedicated server provider. Our system administrator is his employee.A Chinese system administrator has an interest in T or HPS? What you can win by launching false accusations against HPS?There is a discrepancy between what SPH said and what was revealed in our directory.If it is proved beyond doubt that the information in our record is false and has no IP address SPH was "grabbing" content on our website during the stipulated deadline will apologize unreservedly for HPS in Temasek investigation under its "TOP NEWS "section immediately.We will also lodge a formal complaint with our hosting company and terminate its services without delay.Now it's between SPH and RTG Asia. We are as concerned as any to find out the truth.HPS should be aware of exactly what happened and show us the real test of his record instead of relying on half-baked arguments and inconsistent data to mislead the public. "not see the rationale to take this subject either SPHS TRS or blog - and there is a simple reason that there are currently 147 definitions of what is and is not a DDOS attack, and even if we include input and output DDoS attacks, the number of interpretations are multiplied significantly - even the best experts in this area is still disagreement about what is and is not a DDoS attack.So it is conceivable that both TR and SPH can not even use the same mandate to discuss this topic. I can not really see it as something that can be solved only disclose information on server logs, at least, will only confuse most readers, because they have neither the desire or knowledge (including myself) to make a society informed decision on this issue .Our concern is strategic, that we do not believe that the Internet is an effective platform to resolve the conflict - at best only exacerbate climate of fear in order to counteract several online free speech and responsibility at worst, being exploited by Eager Beaver bureaucrats who are only willing to use this as an excuse to launch an online series of rigorous standards, guidelines and legislation, we're sure will have a negative effect on growth of economic interest Internet.It would be beneficial for all parties much if both SPH and TR retreat to continue their cat fight online with immediate effect and seek to resolve their differences in a quorum in the real world - we believe this not only maintaining social harmony in the Internet, but also enable both parties to resolve their disagreement objects in a more friendly and pleasant - apart from what I can deduce from all this, nobody is really interested in this cat fight arrogant - If is something that can only serve as a distraction from more important issues currently being discussed in this excellent blog and elsewhere more blog-o-sphere.We hope that both SPH and RT takes into account the wider implications of what we have mentioned, which is more important to respect the interests of the majority of Internet users - like the sun does not revolve around them, nor the internet heavenly properties - to be indifferent to the reason, I fear.Jeremy, go and ask Singapore daddy aka Sergei / you said. It is also twice as much as the official all Laison Osfront. Regularly rejects death sentences Downs authorizing the closure of the gaming forums every time you misbehave in Russia. He and his gangsters asdf pets. This is the Gestapo or the SS of brotherhood. Begins in doors, shut the facility down and start to question all, every time a nuclear weapons site. Russians living in constant fear of them. So do not be surprised if they are probably the only one who knows what is really happening here. Otherwise why would they want to keep everything in movies? Use your brain!Hi guys, this is just a little chat again by TR. I will not participate further in this matter in a silly tackle "DDOS" after this comment.TR has been to provide answers to the commentators, impetuous and self-censorship, some comments. I think that is why they have caused some nest of wasps everywhere (seriously editorial control over throw objects out of the sleeve), and it made them paranoid thinking everyone is your enemy.It is clear that T is a strong supporter of free speech. And among those who express doubt is the foundation of checks and balances. It goes both ways. Comment about users, including the comment about you. If T really serve their sentences in this, they must also learn to manage in an independent civilian.In his recent reply to my question, management issues, including how to respond to anonymous posters (that's me =)), which question his version of truth. Then answer - open letter to SPH TR is also anonymous. In fact, TR is not even a legal entity, while Geoffrey is a real person. TR has placed his image in their eyes on their website. So you can see: TR - anonymous poster, without legal personality, while Geoffrey - person in real life openly with the image splashed on your site. It answers the question himself by TR.I think TR admin too emotional. Comments on a site which TR can be expected, since the articles are so biased. You must be polite and open, even under duress. He does not only represent themselves. If you can, what you need to censor free speech, which is against their principles? To hide the truth? To project an image without the squeaky spots?Where is everyone? I begin my first apologize for the delay in responding (this is the place to even have a conversation Memphisto?). You and the other tribes should remain calm - you can understand that we have always valued his friendship, as we do with the TR can say that friendship is all that really means something to us, no friendship, no community not society can not exist without the community and society can not be such a thing as peace and without peace, we can not thrive - we do not understand?You must be on the other side also understand that there are limits to what we can realistically accomplish here, no doubt trying to keep up with them, but not the right time, but always remember that we do not have the right to prevent that people say it, or on the internet, but surely we can all choose how you would react to all these strange events to draw a conclusion either smart or stupid.For me the only thing that matters is the four houses of the guilds unanimously adopted, after many conversations with us that there was never a DDoS attack on Temasek Review - Why T represents a different way? Irrelevant. What is your motivation? Irrelevant. SPH or TR is to tell the truth? No effect again - not to go to other people's houses without invitation and tell them how they run their households.As I said, the only thing that matters is the safety of gilded copper, there was never a DDoS attack on TR, but not even so much as once happened - so everything is as it should be - to my friends, I will try to put in perspective, if the guilds are not losing sleep over this issue and have the most to lose - why the rest of you so restless
Olá! Se você ainda não assinou, assine nosso RSS feed e receba nossas atualizações por email, ou siga nos no Twitter.
Nome: Email:

0 comments:

Post a Comment